Selection Criteria
Our comprehensive evaluation process for award recipients
Key Evaluation Areas
🎓 Academic Excellence
Demonstrated outstanding achievements in research, scholarship, and contributions to knowledge advancement. Includes educational qualifications, academic positions, and teaching excellence.
📚 Research Impact
Quality and significance of research publications, citations, h-index, and influence on the scientific community. Evaluation of groundbreaking discoveries and innovative methodologies.
💡 Innovation & Creativity
Novel approaches, original thinking, and creative problem-solving in research. Development of new theories, technologies, or methodologies that advance the field.
🌍 Global Impact
Contribution to addressing global challenges and societal needs. Real-world applications and benefits of research to communities, industries, or environmental sustainability.
🤝 Collaboration & Leadership
Evidence of successful collaborations, team leadership, mentorship, and capacity building. Contributions to interdisciplinary research and international partnerships.
🏆 Professional Recognition
Previous awards, honors, invited lectures, editorial positions, and recognition by peers. Membership in prestigious academies and professional societies.
Evaluation Process
Stage 1: Initial Screening
All nominations undergo an initial review to verify completeness, eligibility, and adherence to submission guidelines. Incomplete applications are not forwarded to the next stage.
Stage 2: Expert Panel Review
Qualified nominations are evaluated by a panel of subject matter experts who assess the scientific merit, innovation, and impact of the nominee’s work. Each nomination is reviewed by at least three independent reviewers.
Stage 3: Comparative Analysis
Reviewers compare nominees within each category using standardized scoring criteria. Nominations are ranked based on overall excellence, impact, and alignment with award objectives.
Stage 4: Selection Committee Deliberation
The Selection Committee reviews top-ranked nominations from each category, discusses merits, and makes final recommendations. The committee ensures diversity, equity, and excellence in selection.
Stage 5: Final Approval & Notification
Award winners are approved by the Board of Directors and officially notified. Winners receive detailed feedback and are invited to the award ceremony. Results are publicly announced on the website.
Scoring Metrics
30%
Research Quality
Publications, citations, peer recognition, and scientific rigor
25%
Innovation
Originality, creativity, and breakthrough contributions
25%
Impact
Real-world applications and societal benefits
10%
Leadership
Mentorship, collaboration, and community engagement
10%
Recognition
Professional achievements and honors received
Review Panel Composition
🎓 Academic Experts
Distinguished professors and researchers from leading universities worldwide with extensive experience in their respective fields and proven track records of excellence.
🏢 Industry Leaders
Senior executives and innovators from leading technology companies, research institutions, and industry organizations who understand practical applications and market impact.
🔬 Research Scientists
Active researchers from national laboratories, research centers, and scientific institutions who contribute to cutting-edge discoveries and technological advancements.
🏆 Previous Award Winners
Past recipients of prestigious awards who bring valuable perspective on excellence, impact, and the qualities that define outstanding scientific achievement.
Ethical Standards
⚖️
Impartiality
All nominations evaluated fairly without bias or discrimination
🔒
Confidentiality
Submissions and deliberations kept strictly confidential
🤝
Transparency
Clear criteria and processes communicated to all participants
🚫
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers recuse themselves from evaluating known associates
✓
Integrity
Highest ethical standards maintained throughout the process
👥
Diversity
Commitment to diversity and inclusion in selection
Questions About Selection?
Our selection process is designed to be fair, transparent, and rigorous. If you have questions about the criteria or evaluation process, please contact us.